Menlove's Flaming Hayrick
Vaughan v. Menlove
132 Eng. Rep. 490 (C.P. 1837)
"... he ought not to be responsible for the misfotune of not possessing the highest order of intelligence."
A diplomatic way of saying it's not my client's fault that he's a drooling idiot....
posted by Gryphen at 6:42 AM
3 Comments:
i think i remember hearing something about this case...
i think i remember not even knowing what class that is from (i'm a bit of a slacker)(in this case bit means a really big one).
When reading this case last week in torts, I did think about the blogger.
Post a Comment
<< Home